39 Ways to Jihad


Published in Arabic by Al Qaeda in 2003, 39 Ways to Serve and Participate in Jihad is a tedious 65 page recruitment tract that calls readers to “a clear and intense war void of any rest or mercy – until the Command of Allāh arrives.” The introduction asserts, “There is nothing more obligatory upon the Muslims after having belief in Allāh than Jihād and repelling the invader who has occupied the lands of the Muslims.” In style and phrasing it reads like a ritual chant, often repeating Qur’anic passages and pious phrases like, “may Allah be pleased with him.”

The text might have been written, copied, revised, and distributed by mountain men and warlords over hundreds of years, through the series of inter-generational military campaigns leading up to this moment in Afghan politics, for all we know. It reads like a 15th century relic with a medieval level of insight into theology, philosophy, logistics and weaponry. Its periodic references to modern politics and media seem tangential to the overall thrust of the work. 39 Ways includes a variety of the ancient guilt tripping methods, still used by American military recruiters.

Authorship attributed to Muhammad bin Ahmad as-Salim (‘Isa al-‘Awshin), 39 Ways takes the form of a religious devotional. It cherry picks verses from the Qur’an, Hadith, and quotes from scholars, and assembles them into emotionally manipulative brain fog, designed to provoke cognitive dissonance: “Having the intention with one’s self to go fight removes a characteristic of hypocrisy from a person.”

It threatens and persuades with rhythmic assertions, while employing several cunning traps for the religious. It celebrates martyrs, condemns hypocrites, and challenges faith, compelling the faithful to reconsider their beliefs in light of a tougher doctrine, for fear of being labeled an apostate. Exploiting its readers’ fear, guilt, pride, compassion, and fealty, all 39 ways are relatively redundant celebrations of a violent style of jihad. It is a call for justice through the venture of warfare.

Because of its evil premise, that jihad is warfare in the most corporal sense, taken to an extreme by ISIL with the additional imperialist doctrines of expansion, procreation, pillaging, and enslavement, 39 Ways cannot be dismissed as nincompoopery. It still circulates online, through forums, available for download.

Most of the links that come up through my internet searches take the Western perspective, calling it terrorist literature. The most recent sincere recommendation of the book I found on Twitter, @jihadbook, by Musa Kahn, provided a link on October 2, 2013. Contemporary American jurisprudence is that it is illegal to spread the ideas expressed in 39 Ways. An American appeals court judge compared the book to the “bubonic plague,” and its English translator, Tarek Mehanna, is now in prison for his effort.

I interviewed Mehanna’s brother Tamer Mehanna in the fall of 2011 at a mutual friend’s apartment, and our conversation stirred up righteous anger at the injustice of a man being imprisoned in America because of his speech. Later that evening, at home, I downloaded a PDF of 39 Ways, and read it with increasing distress.

 Tarek is serving 17.5 years in prison for intellectual efforts characterized by the U.S. government as material aid to terrorists, including his translation of 39 Ways to Serve and Participate in Jihad. For more information visit freetarek.wordpress.com.
Tarek is serving 17.5 years in prison for intellectual efforts characterized by the U.S. government as material aid to terrorists, including his translation of 39 Ways to Serve and Participate in Jihad. For more information visit freetarek.wordpress.com.

The book is a potpourri of war mongering disguised as scripture. I can imagine how it could coerce a young mind struggling with existential questions about death, sex, and purpose, into a violent struggle against the U.S. military and police force. Teenagers love to play the martyr, and 39 Ways offers a cause. I can’t support Tarek Mehanna’s ideas, but I have faith in the principle of freedom of speech. Imprisoning someone for writing is unjust. The world is not perfect, but I think we can make it better without violence, by not imprisoning people for speaking their minds, by discussing ideas openly.

This website is an evolving response to the idea that jihad can only mean holy warfare. It examines justifications for killing individuals for the sins of a community, and conversely rationals for invading communities for the sins of a few individuals. Ultimately I want to familiarize readers with the meaning and history of the word jihad, defined as a holy struggle, and also to discuss the reasons for the ongoing conflicts in the Middle East. In posts on this site, I offer reflections on how we might jihad for social justice.

My posts on this site will vary, but ultimately, I plan to respond point by point to the entire text to 39 Ways to Jihad. Also I want to challenge a creeping injustice, an attempt to control speech through intimidation. Jailing people for writing and translation is unconstitutional, and it just feels wrong and counter productive. In this blog I explore freedom of speech, and also challenge society to grow up. Let’s not take every text as gospel, and let’s counter speech with speech.

The English PDF of 39 Ways is floating around in fairly old posts on various active discussion boards. This is the version that Google collected in its archive. I’ll add the text of each chapter below, in fair use, as context for my commentary.

This is probably not the text of 39 Ways to Serve and Participate in Jihad that Tarek Mehanna is in prison for translating, because the text circulates online in several versions. There’s a similar book with a slightly less catchy title, 44 Ways to Support Jihad, written by the late Anwar Al-Awlaki, also an American citizen, struck by a drone on 30 September 2011. Gang justice. Violence begets violence, and Al-Awlaki put himself in an awkward spot with his violent rhetoric. I explore the ethics of execution, torture and imprisonment, along with the meaning of terrorism, freedom of speech, “material support” and the objects of warfare. But what I’m really interested in is how we each might struggle to live our one life well.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s